Around and around the drama continues.
Earlier this week, Logan Paul took to Instagram, asserting that he possessed some potentially incriminating footage of Dillon Danis. He alleged that Danis had compelled DAZN to edit several segments from their face-off interview, including Danis allegedly admitting to a crime. Many viewers speculated that somewhere in that interview, Danis had confessed to certain accusations regarding Paul’s fiancée, Nina Agdal.
RELATED: Logan Paul’s Fiancée Nina Agdal Sues Dillon Danis, Files for Restraining Order
“He made them cut his stuttering and stumbling over his sentences, looking like a f*cking idiot. He made them cut him lying about having some photo and multiple other lies. And most importantly, he made them cut him incriminating himself in a federal crime. I have the version, I have a little clip I’ve assembled and I’ll put that out tomorrow. But I guess he was right, that sh*t was edited. But don’t worry Dillon, the people are going to see it,” he said.
Almost immediately after Paul shared the video, Danis fired back on social media. He accused Paul of being a “rat,” citing lawsuits and alleged snitching. He insinuated that Paul couldn’t defend himself or his fiancée without involving the law, labeling him a coward. Furthermore, Danis posted more photos related to Agdal.
Danis has repeatedly targeted the model in the lead-up to his fight against Paul, attempting to get under his skin. In response, Agdal filed a lawsuit against him, accusing him of hacking her devices to access private content, and she obtained a temporary restraining order.
Now, Logan Paul has taken to Twitter to release the contested footage. In the clip, the two engage in verbal jabs, and Danis hints at possessing another photograph. He claims he can’t discuss or share the photo, fearing that Paul may cancel the fight or take legal action if he does.
When Paul questions why Danis believes he would sue, Danis alleges that Paul sent him a cease and desist over “real pictures.” Paul emphatically denies having any such photograph, and a heated exchange ensues. “Even if you did, which you don’t,” Paul asserts, “the fact that you are admitting on Twitter to distributing and sending an explicit image to people is already a crime in itself.”
