Yesterday Adam Schefter revealed his skepticism during an ESPN broadcast about the rising odds of the Los Angeles Chargers trading up in the NFL Draft.
Schefter, taken aback by the shift in odds provided by ESPN Bet, expressed confusion given his inside knowledge suggested the opposite.
On ESPN’s “Get Up!” the day before the 2024 NFL Draft, Schefter shared insights from a month prior, questioning the likelihood of the Chargers considering a trade involving quarterback Justin Herbert due to the financial implications. “Could this be? Would anybody in Los Angeles consider taking JJ McCarthy?” Schefter queried. He pointed out that trading Herbert would trigger a historically high cap charge over $100 million due to his contract, which led him to question, “Is this some sort of gimmick?”
RELATED: ‘Everyone’ Reportedly Trading Up For One Position In NFL Draft On Thursday Night
The controversy extends beyond Schefter’s comments, as critics on Twitter have accused ESPN of misusing their dual role as a news source and a betting platform.
One viral tweet criticized ESPN for potentially manipulating betting odds, describing it as “sanctioned money laundering.” Another questioned the ethics and legality of a news outlet running a gambling operation, suggesting that such practices should attract regulatory scrutiny from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
This debate underscores the complex issues at play when a sports network like ESPN operates a betting service.
The discussion was further fueled in March when ESPN host Rece Davis described a college basketball bet as a “risk-free investment,” adding to the ongoing concerns about the potential conflicts of interest within ESPN’s operations.
