Conservative sports commentator Jason Whitlock has stirred controversy by criticizing the WNBA contracts of Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese, suggesting they are overpaid and risk developing a sense of entitlement akin to retired soccer star Megan Rapinoe.
Both Clark and Reese, widely regarded as standout players in women’s college basketball, recently signed rookie contracts with the Indiana Fever and the Chicago Sky, respectively, worth just over $70,000 annually.
Whitlock’s concerns stem from the unprecedented ratings that women’s college basketball received this past season, particularly during Clark and Reese’s games.
Despite the sport’s growing popularity, some critics remain dissatisfied with the compensation offered to these rising stars.
“In 30 years, the WNBA has never once turned a profit. The women are overpaid already at $75K a year. They’re trying to create a sense of entitlement in these women.”
Drawing parallels to Rapinoe’s advocacy for equal treatment and pay in women’s sports, Whitlock warns against Clark and Reese adopting a mindset of entitlement.
He emphasizes the importance of humility and gratitude, suggesting that any perception of entitlement could harm their careers.
While Whitlock acknowledges Reese’s likability as a potential asset for the WNBA, he does not comment on Clark’s appeal.
Nevertheless, he urges the league to capitalize on Reese’s positive image rather than squander it.
In defense of his stance, Whitlock asserts that women’s sports have not been treated unfairly, disputing claims propagated on social media and college campuses.
He points out that the average WNBA base salary last season was $113,295, with top earners nearing $250,000 annually.
