Tom Brady and Kevin Burkhardt teamed up on the call for FOX’s broadcast of the NFC North rivalry matchup between the Detroit Lions and Green Bay Packers this past Sunday. Brady, in his role as an analyst, is subject to several restrictions due to his minority ownership stake in the Las Vegas Raiders. One such rule prohibits him from openly criticizing game officials during broadcasts. However, that didn’t stop Brady from expressing his disagreement with a key officiating decision during the game.
The controversy arose after Lions defensive back Brian Branch was ejected from the game for an illegal hit to the head on a defenseless receiver.
Almost immediately, Brady voiced his disapproval of the officials’ decision, expressing that he didn’t agree with the ejection. His remarks prompted some fans to wonder if the 47-year-old had overstepped his boundaries and violated the league’s rules about owners commenting on officiating.
The following day, an NFL spokesperson stepped forward to clarify the situation. Brian McCarthy, an NFL spokesperson, addressed the incident, making it clear that Brady would not face any disciplinary action for his comments.
“The concern would be if Tom was egregiously critical of officiating or called into question the integrity of an official or the crew. That did not occur in this instance,” McCarthy told Ben Fischer of Sports Business Journal.
RELATED: Luxury Car Donated by Tom Brady to High School Disappears After $367,000 Raffle
Essentially, the league determined that Brady’s comments did not cross the line into “egregious” territory or challenge the integrity of the officials, which is the threshold for potential punishment. Brady’s criticism was seen as mild and within acceptable bounds, meaning there would be no repercussions for the former quarterback.
Brady’s initial comments during the broadcast were measured, saying, “I don’t love that call at all. I mean, obviously, it’s a penalty, but, to me, that has to be serious intent in a game like this.” The statement conveyed disagreement without directly attacking the officials or implying any kind of bias or incompetence on their part.
The restrictions on Brady’s broadcasting role stem from his minority ownership stake in the Las Vegas Raiders. As an NFL team owner, even in a limited capacity, Brady is subject to specific league rules that are intended to prevent conflicts of interest or the appearance of bias.
As part of those restrictions, Brady is banned from visiting non-Raiders facilities and from attending production meetings with teams outside of the Raiders. Additionally, he is not allowed to criticize officials or other teams on air in a way that might undermine the league’s credibility.
Despite these limitations, Brady’s presence in the broadcast booth has been a significant draw for audiences, blending his vast knowledge of the game with his charismatic personality.
However, situations like Sunday’s demonstrate the tightrope he must walk as both an NFL owner and a television analyst. His critique of the Brian Branch ejection was candid enough to provide insight for viewers but careful enough to avoid stepping outside the bounds set by the NFL.
While some fans might have hoped for a more direct critique of the officiating, it’s clear that Brady is navigating his dual roles with caution. His measured approach ensures he stays on the right side of league regulations while still offering his unique perspective as a former player and now as an owner.
For now, it appears that Brady has managed to strike that delicate balance—at least until the next controversial call comes along.
