Former Las Vegas Raiders head coach Jon Gruden has achieved a significant legal victory in his ongoing battle to hold the NFL accountable for the leaked emails that led to his resignation in 2021. Gruden’s lawsuit, which claims that the NFL deliberately leaked racist and homophobic emails to force his ouster, is now set to be fully reviewed by the Nevada Supreme Court.
This development marks a crucial step in Gruden’s quest for justice, as he alleges that the league orchestrated the release of private emails in an effort to damage his career.
The emails in question were sent by Gruden to former Washington Commanders executive Bruce Allen between 2011 and 2018, during Gruden’s time as an ESPN commentator. The content of these emails, which included offensive remarks about NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, NFLPA Executive Director DeMaurice Smith, and other figures, became public during an investigation into the Washington Commanders’ workplace misconduct.
Gruden’s comments included a racially charged insult about Smith, referring to him as “Dumboriss Smith” and comparing his lips to “Michelin tires.” Additionally, Gruden made homophobic slurs directed at Goodell, calling him a “clueless anti-football p****” and a “f*****.”
The Nevada Supreme Court’s decision to take on a full review comes after a lower court panel split 2-1 earlier this year, allowing the NFL to move the case to arbitration. The arbitration process, which could have been overseen by Goodell, was a point of contention. Two justices argued that Gruden had agreed to arbitration when signing his contract with the Raiders, while a dissenting justice called it “outrageous” for Goodell to be involved in arbitrating a case where he is a named defendant.
RELATED: Mark Davis Would ‘LOVE TO’ Bring Back Jon Gruden as Raiders Head Coach
Gruden’s lawsuit claims that Goodell and the NFL pressured the Raiders to fire him by selectively leaking the offensive emails. According to Gruden, this was done with the intention of forcing his resignation while protecting other parties involved in the larger investigation, such as former Washington Commanders owner Dan Snyder.
The lawsuit argues that Gruden became a scapegoat, with his personal communications exposed while others were shielded from public scrutiny.
The legal battle dates back to 2021, when Gruden resigned as head coach of the Raiders following the release of the emails in the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. The emails were uncovered as part of the NFL’s investigation into the Washington Commanders’ toxic workplace environment and Snyder’s alleged sexual harassment.
Although the investigation led to a $10 million fine for the Commanders, the NFL chose not to release specific details regarding Snyder’s involvement, citing privacy concerns—a decision that has been met with widespread criticism.
Gruden’s legal team has argued that the NFL intentionally leaked only his emails to create public outrage and force his resignation, while shielding others involved in the investigation. The judge overseeing the initial case found merit in Gruden’s claim, suggesting that a jury could decide whether the league acted with “specific intent” to damage his reputation.
Raiders owner Mark Davis reportedly viewed the email leaks as a setup. According to ESPN, Davis was initially inclined to keep Gruden as the team’s head coach but was pressured by Goodell to “do something” in response to the public backlash. This pressure came at a time when Snyder was facing increased scrutiny over allegations of sexual harassment, and many believe the NFL’s handling of Gruden’s emails was a way to deflect attention away from the Commanders’ scandal.
As Gruden seeks monetary damages, alleging that the selective disclosure of his emails has ruined his coaching career and endorsement deals, the case continues to unfold with implications that stretch beyond his personal grievances.
The legal battle sheds light on the NFL’s internal politics and raises questions about the league’s transparency, especially when it comes to investigations involving high-profile figures like Snyder.
Gruden, who coached the Raiders from 1998 to 2001 and again from 2018 to 2021, as well as leading the Tampa Bay Buccaneers to a Super Bowl victory in 2003, has maintained that the NFL unfairly targeted him.
With the Nevada Supreme Court now stepping in to review the case, all eyes will be on the proceedings as they could set a precedent for how disputes involving high-profile coaches, teams, and league executives are handled moving forward.
The outcome of this case could not only affect Gruden’s career and reputation but also impact how the NFL navigates future controversies and arbitration agreements with its coaches and executives.
